# Euler’s Formula: a Calculus Approach

# Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

# Email This Story

Euler’s Formula, Logarithm of a Negative Number, and Complex Exponentiation

Euler’s formula is an important mathematical identity that was discovered in 1740 by Swiss mathematician Leonhard Euler. Euler, who is regarded today as one of the greatest mathematicians of all time, authored numerous mathematical papers and made groundbreaking discoveries and contributions in mathematics. One of the most well-known results from Euler is his famous equation that is derived in this paper:

It is one of the most important, versatile and profound mathematical formulas in mathematics. The equation was literally voted in a 1988 poll as the most beautiful mathematical^{2} expression ever derived.

Several mathematicians were close to deriving the formula before Euler, but the equation did not take its form as it is in today until Euler used De Moivre’s theorem^{3} to derive it in his pre-calculus book. Its importance was not discovered until mathematicians began to realize its versatility and significance in other areas of mathematics^{4}.

I independently discovered this derivation by accident while I was taking a calculus II course. My goal was not to derive an identity, but to find different methods of integration. The idea of substituting complex variables interested me, and I soon found that integrating certain functions with complex variables lead to the same equation: Euler’s formula. Here is the original way I derived the formula.

Remark

Riemann integrals^{5} are defined for real numbers, and including complex numbers^{6} may seem illegal. One must go back through real analysis and confirm that the complex numbers satisfy results that the real numbers satisfy in order to use specific theorems established in real analysis. In other words, using complex numbers is mathematically illegal until its legality is proven, which I have already completed in a formal proof of this using the Jacobian for making a transformation.

I’ve made an extensive search across the internet to see if this derivation has been discovered, and I have come up empty. That is why I maintain this to be my own work.

Consider the indefinite integral

where .

The function inside of the integral is the upper half of an arbitrary hyperbola^{8}.

Real derivation

Using trigonometric substitution, substitute the expression where

The integral then becomes

Given the trigonometric identity we can substitute the expression to give an even simpler integral.

The integral has a lengthy derivation and it is omitted.

Through integration by parts, the most general antiderivative (where c=0) is equivalent to

However, the reason why the absolute value is added to the antiderivative is to avoid the natural logarithm of a negative number. This is going to be defined, but in order to define it, the absolute value symbol must first be removed.

Using the expression

and substituting it, the following is obtained:

To change the variables back into the xy-plane, one must derive different trigonometric expressions in terms of *x*. A common way to do this is to use a triangle to better visualize the expressions^{9}.

If then which explains the structure of the triangle.

Using the pythagorean theorem, We can see that

Finally, the antiderivative may be expressed in terms of x.

Complex derivation

This is what derives the interesting results. The derivation of the integral involves a substitution where the variables are transformed to the complex plane.

Using trigonometric substitution, the expression can be substituted into the integral

Omitting the derivation, which implies

In order to transfer back to rectangular coordinates, another triangle is used again.

Using to derive the triangle, we can find an expression for

The Pythagorean theorem can be used to find *q*.

Substituting the new expression for *q* to derive

Transferring back to rectangular coordinates,

Thus, we have two expressions from the same integral, one from the real plane and one from the complex plane. Equating the two expressions, we have

Notice that if we set *a=1*, we get

Thus, the logarithm of a negative number is a complex number, leading to what is known as one of the most beautiful mathematical expressions ever derived:

This gives a definition for the logarithm of a negative number.

Continuing with the derivation, we are met with the equation

Notice that can be subtracted from both sides,

Using the fact that and we have that and raising this equation to the power of *e *we obtain Euler’s formula:

which is the definition for complex exponentiation.

The idea behind this can be thought of in terms of linear algebra. It can first be shown that the complex plane forms a vector space. Then it can be shown that the transformation from the real plane into the complex plane is linear, one-to-one, and onto, if the transformation matrix A is given by the basis vectors of the complex plane^{10}. Not surprisingly, the transformation has no effect on the area. That is why when the two integrals are equated, despite their differing transformations and derivations, an identity is obtained.

Notes:

- In Euler’s formula,
*e*is**Euler’s constant**, 2.71828…;*i*is the**imaginary unit ;**is the**independent variable**; and are the**trigonometric functions**. For our purposes, we shall consider or - Euler’s formula is the most fundamental identity of all identities. It is the connection between logarithms and inverse trigonometric functions, the connection between the exponential function and the complex trigonometric functions (i.e.,, and it is a primary focus of study in complex analysis. It is very useful tool in differentiation, as it can be used to simplify equations through substitutions. The formula also has numerous implications upon the area of Fourier Analysis. The most interesting part, however, is to note that it is the general equation of a circle in the
**complex plane (**the plane on the left is the complex plane). One of the most prominent theoretical physicists of the 20th century, Richard Feynman, was quoted while describing the formula as a “jewel” and “the most remarkable formula in mathematics.

- See http://eulerarchive.maa.org/hedi/HEDI-2007-08.pdf for a historical treatment of Euler’s formula, in addition to the original way he discovered it.

- As with many formulas, the expression has numerous philosophical implications. The expression can be seen as the intersection of algebra, geometry, arithmetic, and the complex and real numbers. It is also notable because it has the two most important and famous constants of mathematics. is from geometry,
*e*is from algebra, 1 and 0 are the two most basic real numbers,*i*is from the complex numbers.

- A
**Riemann integral**is a method of finding the area under a curve using very thin rectangles to approximate the area. The integrals in the derivation, however, are called indefinite integrals. In rough terms, finding the indefinite integral of a function in the xy-plane is equivalent to finding a formula for its area under the curve.**Note:**In all of the indefinite integral expressions, I omit all constants and assume the most general formulas with c=0.

**Real numbers**are simply everyday numbers (e.g., 1, 2, 0.5, 0.00005, 3.33…, ).**Complex numbers**are the set of numbers where*a, b*are real numbers (Ex: 2+0.0055432i, 3+5*i*are complex numbers).

- The
**hyperbola**in question looks like the following:

- In calculus,
**trigonometric substitution**is used to simplify expressions and to ease the obtainment of the indefinite integral. It simply involves momentarily transforming the expressions into another coordinate system, and transferring back to the original coordinate system after the integration has been completed. The purpose of the triangle is used in a non-rigorous manner to find different trigonometric expressions.

- In a rough manner, one could lay the real plane on top of the complex plane so that they would never overlap each other and they would be exact replicas. Each and every point is mapped to one and only one point when the transformation matrix is given by the basis vectors of the complex plane.

Very cool article to see connection between e, i, 1, and pi.